|
(Meeting
of North American and Cuban Philosophers and Social Scientists)
By Peggy Rivage-Seul
THE GREAT HALL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAVANA
June 28, 2002
September 11 provided a teachable moment for both the Left and
the Right in the United States. And this pedagogical moment has
been seized by the Right with a vengeance. Most professors in university
departments and government officials have taken this opportunity
to deliver a simplistic answer to the question raised by the American
public: Why do they hate us? President Bush answered the question
by saying that "America is a beacon of freedom and democracy,
and that is why they attacked our centers of free trade and national
security." This message is carrying the day.
Those on the Left have experienced the same teachable moment.
Our message has been an appeal to history, along the lines that
Cliff has explained. We have disseminated this information in our
classrooms, in university Teach-Ins, and in rallies like the march
in Washington on April 20, which drew 75,000-100,000 people. Still
our message is not hear. George Bush enjoys approval ratings of
80%. This is the bad news.
The good news is that Cliff's interpretation, which I assume most
of us share, is much stronger than that given in the "Official
Story." It is historical; it has internal coherence, external
coherence, and above all, explanatory value. For this reason, our
story is more compelling. If Philip Agee is correct that the social
project in the United States is to develop critical consciousness,
then we are in the right time and place to facilitate a change
in the national consensus. Moreover, the numbers of those sharing
our explanation on a worldwide scale far exceeds the numbers of
those who endorse President Bush's story. They represent the Group
of 7 or 8. We represent the Group of 6 billion.
Despite the overwhelming numbers on our side, the task before
us is daunting. This is because the Group of 7 or 8 controls the
microphone, to a large extent. They are successfully broadcasting
their message through a servile global media, and through mainstream
education. In the face of such communication power, our task as
teachers is to wrest the microphone from their hands and replace
them at the podium.
How do we do that? Coming together on this beautiful island, so
generative of insight and new thought, we are in a position to
answer that question. We are, after all, a group of radical scholars.
It seems clear to me that we have a golden opportunity to organize
and network to develop strategies for making a difference in a
sustained way when we return to the United States. In the post
September 11 process, we have wide experience of effective organizational
responses. My hope is that we will share these experiences and
planning strategies in this group so that we can get the microphone
in our hands and assume our rightful place at podium. If we don't
take this opportunity, I'm afraid we will have missed the boat.
As I walk the streets of Havana, I am reminded of Plato's "Allegory
of the Cave." Here in socialist Cuba, we are like the escapee.
We are undoing the lies they have told us about the lack of democracy
in Cuba. We see for ourselves the devastating effects of U.S. policy
towards our fellow human beings. And like that prisoner, when we
return to the United States, we will re-enter the darkness of the
shadow world projected by our government, the media, and our educational
system. And if we go back individualistically, we will suffer the
same fate as Plato's protagonist. That is, we won't be listened
to, and we will be under threat by those whose chains are formed
by links of consumerism, patriotism and fear.
So, for my part, I want to suggest that we put our heads together
about this crisis which presents us with both danger and opportunity.
We need to seize it and as they say-organize, organize, organize.
|