|
The term "Guided Learning" was coined in 1996
in a joint effort by faculty, students and staff of Berea College.
The term reflects a unique understanding and practice of student
development.
...residence life aims to create an atmosphere
conducive to students learning to be independent persons in a
community where
diversity and difference are respected. Living in a residence
facility naturally allows for learning to think, judge, and act
in managing
one's own time, in resolving disputes, in dealing with others
who are similar or different to oneself, in learning to set priorities
among the myriad activities of life. Such learning to live and
live well requires an atmosphere where people have time to interact
and reflect, where they have the latitude to try (and sometimes
fail), where constraints are minimal (e.g., to prevent catastrophic
consequences to self or others, to prevent harm to others, to
achieve
general, indivisible social goods, etc.).
The modifier "guided" emphasizes learning
in an atmosphere that does not emphasize mandates, compulsion,
coercion, control, but also does not constitute a complete
laissez faire policy either. The term "guided" emphasizes support, encouragement,
creative response that is interpersonal: persons guide persons. The term "guided" emphasizes
non-formulaic, non-methodological, non-mechanical, non-programmatic ways
of people responding and interacting. It emphasizes the qualified, trained
judgment of
staff in dealing with people, issues and situations. It emphasizes the
variety of learning that results. (excerpted from the Report
of the Residence Life Review
Committee, section V. Guided Learning)
Berea College, in a 1912 (Lott vs. Berea
College) Supreme Court case, accepted the role of En Loco Partentis meaning, "in
place of the parents." Until the mid-1990's, residence life policies, processes
and administrative structures reflected a parental approach based on rules and
punishment. It was understood that living on a college campus was an extension
of home life and the nature of the relationship between faculty/staff and students
should reflect the same kind of relationship between parents and children. Slowly,
through a variety of environmental indicators, it became evident that Berea College
was ready to re-define itself in such a way that meant minimizing reliance on
formal structures and letting individuals empower themselves. Thus, the college
began its journey toward a shared identity of the campus as a community of adult
learners, sharing the work of community building rather than relying on traditional
administrative roles and mere compliance to rules and regulations. This redefinition
would lead to cross-departmental collaboration, policies based on principles
of civility rather than control and punishment, and the elevation in importance
of constructive interpersonal dialogue to bring about change.
The same change
effort that created Guided Learning also brought about a restructuring
of student life administrative processes. For many years, residential
life as a department
functioned in a traditional hierarchy of a dean and associate directors
to coordinate housing, judicials, orientation, etc. Becoming practitioners
of guided learning
on this structural level meant breaking down departments, structuring teams
across divisions and relinquishing titles. Collegium team members
now share responsibility
for all the Student Life processes once exacted by deans, directors, and
part time hall directors. This now means most Collegium members
live in residence
halls where most of the extracurricular opportunities for guiding and working
with students occur.

In essence, the Collegium is a team of equals
working together to achieve shared goals; overarching all others
is the
goal to become an integrated,
continuous learning environment.
A Guided Learning Approach |
With student
staff means: |
With residence
hall community means: |
With Collegium
team means: |
- Matching level of responsibility with level of training/experience
- Shared
leadership
- Exploration of diverse viewpoints and methods
- Creative decision-making
|
- Facilitating healthy dialogue about hall concerns and
issues
- Working with staff and hall council to develop policies
and guidelines
- Promoting
community perception of staff as a resource rather than
police
- Being
accessible and responsive to residents
|
- Envisioning residential life systems that prom-ote trust-building
and collaboration
- Emphasizing roles/contribution vs. hierarchy/seniority
- Working
across traditional campus divisions
- Commitment to constructive
problem-solving and shared accountability
|
|