Labor and Student Life
Labor Program Office

Fairchild Hall
CPO 2180
859-985-3611

Office Hours:
M–F, 8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.

Contact:

Leadership in a Guided Learning Community
 
A guided learner: A non-guided learner:
  • Listens to people
  • Reflects
  • Asks questions
  • Admits mistakes
  • Includes others in decision-making
  • Welcomes learning
  • Recognizes co-worker success
  • Explores options
  • Builds trust
  • Holds her/himself accountable
  • Welcomes constructive feedback
  • Facilitates 360 Evaluation
  • Promotes win/win
  • Celebrates diversity
  • Collaborates
  • Empowers
  • Talks at people
  • Reacts
  • Makes assumptions
  • Pretends to be perfect
  • Makes decisions in isolation
  • Is always the teacher
  • Broadcasts co-worker failure
  • Rejects all but the status-quo
  • Builds cliques
  • Does not walk the talk
  • Discourages mutual sharing
  • Dominates worker evaluation
  • Competes for power
  • Tolerates diversity
  • Gives orders
  • Micro-manages
 

Collective agreement vs. Compliance
Roles vs. Hierarchy
Guiding vs. Dictating
Choices/Consequences vs. Punishment
Listen vs. Talk/Instruct
Self Direction vs. En Loco Parentis
Critical Thinking vs. Group Think
Service vs. Consumerism

 

Guided Learning is:

A way of interacting with others that is based on individual and group reflection, self-direction, and the fundamental belief that good leadership requires the ability to first, be a good community participant. A Guided Learner strives to balance both individual and community needs and is one who will not sacrifice integrity for popular opinion. Guided Learners know that sometimes they will be the teacher and sometimes the learner depending on who possesses the skill and experience and not necessarily who is in the power position. Policies and processes based on Guided Learning empower groups to be self-governing, encourage healthy challenge of the status quo, minimize leadership hierarchy and emphasize teamwork through commitment to reaching common ground and shared vision.

Berea College, in a 1912 (Lott vs. Berea College) Supreme Court case, accepted the role of En Loco Parentis meaning, "in place of the parents." Until the mid-1990's, residence life policies and processes reflected a parental approach based on rules and punishment. It was understood that living on a college campus was an extension of home life and the nature of the relationship between faculty/administrators and students should reflect the same kind of relationship between parents and children. Eventually, through a variety of environmental indicators, it became evident that Berea College was ready to re-define itself in such a way that empowered and involved all members of the community. Why should everyone be involved? The more people involved, the more the community will have been directly participatory in it's own creation which results in greater commitment to shared vision rather than mere compliance to rules and regulations. This redefinition would include cross-departmental collaboration, policies based on principles of civility rather than control and punishment, and the honoring of civil discussion to bring about change. It can be seen that positive outcomes of the Guided Learning approach include: greater capacity for self-appraisal, creative and critical thought and action, and increased instance of change propelled by healthy collaboration between faculty, staff and students.